Two things before anything else. We are app developers, not tax advisers, and nothing here is tax advice — it is a plain reading of documents the IRS publishes, with links so you can check every one of them yourself. If real money is involved, ask someone qualified. And we have an obvious interest here: we make reward apps, so the honest disclosure is that a payout threshold like ours, where the first cash-out is $2.00, is nowhere near any number on this page. That cuts against the idea that this article is useful to our own users, and it is still true.
This is US federal tax only. State rules differ, and some states do not follow the federal thresholds at all.
The short answer is that most cash back is not income, most of everything else is, and the number nearly every article on this subject quotes for when a form arrives stopped being right on 1 January 2026.
Why cash back usually is not income
The reasoning is older than the apps and it is not complicated. Money handed back to you by the party you bought from is treated as an adjustment to the purchase price rather than as a gain. The reference point is Revenue Ruling 76-96, which concerned a car manufacturer paying rebates to buyers and held that the rebate was not gross income but a reduction in what the buyer paid.
Applied to a receipt-scanning app, the logic is that you are being paid because you bought something, so you did not get richer — you paid slightly less than the sticker said. That is why cash back rarely appears on anyone's return.
The part that is income
The rebate reasoning works because a purchase is attached to it. Remove the purchase and it stops reaching:
- a sign-up bonus for joining,
- a referral payment for bringing someone else in,
- payment for completing a survey or an offer,
- sweepstakes and prize winnings.
None of those is money back on something you bought, so none of them is a discount. For reward apps this matters more than it would for a credit card, because a large share of what these apps pay is for doing something rather than for buying something.
The number that changed for 2026
For decades the answer to “when will they send me a form” was $600. It is not any more.
Section 70433 of P.L. 119-21 raised the information reporting threshold under sections 6041 and 6041A from $600 to $2,000, effective for payments made after 31 December 2025, and indexed for inflation for years after 2026. The $600 figure had stood since 1954 without ever being adjusted. The IRS sets this out in its provisions summary and in the instructions for Forms 1099-MISC and 1099-NEC.
Two qualifications, both from the same material. A payer is still permitted to send you a form below the threshold, so the absence of one proves nothing either way. And Form 1099-K is a separate rule with a separate number, which the same legislation moved back to more than $20,000 and more than 200 transactions.
The threshold is not the tax
This is the point worth carrying away, and it is the one the $600 figure has always obscured. A reporting threshold decides whether a company must tell the IRS about a payment. It does not decide whether the payment is taxable. The IRS says so directly: reporting and backup withholding thresholds do not affect whether income is taxable, and taxpayers must report all income whether or not an information return arrives.
Its own guidance on prizes and awards makes the same point in the concrete: report the amount on line 8i of Schedule 1 even when no Form 1099-MISC is issued. So the threshold going up to $2,000 means fewer forms in the post, not less tax.
Taking it in gift cards does not change it
Where a reward is taxable, the payout method is not the deciding factor. A gift card is treated as a cash equivalent at face value and merchandise at fair market value. What decides the treatment is whether the reward was tied to a purchase, not what arrived at the end.
What this means at the scale these apps actually pay
Honestly, for most people, very little — and it would be strange for us to pretend otherwise when our own first cash-out is $2.00. The whole category pays in cents per action, which is the subject of how reward apps make money, and reaching $2,000 of non-rebate reward income from apps alone would take a volume almost nobody achieves.
Where it stops being theoretical is if you use many apps seriously, take survey and offer income rather than cash back, and add the year up. Nothing above changes with volume except how likely you are to notice it, which is exactly why the threshold is worth understanding as a paperwork rule rather than as a line under which money is free.
And again, because it is the only sentence here that really matters: we are not tax advisers, this is a reading of public documents rather than advice about your situation, and anyone with real money at stake should ask someone qualified.